Hi AButler,
You will need to add the new "ButtonAction" (of type "MotionMacro") to the AutoCAD.xml file in the driver installation directory.
The macro that you posted has the necessary key codes that you will need to use.
Search found 2885 matches
- Tue Mar 17, 2015 8:30 am
- Forum: Developer's Forum for Windows
- Topic: Wait or Delay function for 3dxware 10 custom macro
- Replies: 11
- Views: 24611
- Mon Mar 16, 2015 8:36 am
- Forum: Developer's Forum for Windows
- Topic: MWM transport
- Replies: 10
- Views: 14327
Re: MWM transport
Hi kchase56,
I was expecting you to have been contacted last week. I'm asking where they are with that. I'm sorry for the delay.Any update on these issues?
- Thu Mar 12, 2015 1:09 pm
- Forum: Developer's Forum for Windows
- Topic: Wait or Delay function for 3dxware 10 custom macro
- Replies: 11
- Views: 24611
Re: Wait or Delay function for 3dxware 10 custom macro
Hi AButler, If you do not mind getting yourself in to editing driver profiles, you can try the following: Stop the driver and AutoCAD. Open the AutoCAD.xml file ("Cfg" directory of the driver installation folder) in a text editor. Add a new button action of type "MotionMacro" imm...
- Wed Mar 11, 2015 12:32 pm
- Forum: Developer's Forum for Windows
- Topic: Embarcadero XE7 64bits
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10072
Re: Embarcadero XE7 64bits
Hi valvarez, I think the only approach that you can take to ensure a reasonable level of stability is to create your own native libraries linked to the 3DxWare 10 libs. You can then use your own libraries to load in your application. In other words, you should create wrapper libs (using Visual Studi...
- Tue Mar 10, 2015 12:30 pm
- Forum: Developer's Forum for Windows
- Topic: Trap all button output
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10269
Re: Trap all button output
buttons are still executing radial menus, acting as an "Escape", etc. This is what I want to prevent. So do I understand correctly that I am required to have a configuration file for my daemon application where the buttons are set to be owned by that application only? Launch your applicat...
- Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:35 am
- Forum: Developer's Forum for Windows
- Topic: MWM transport
- Replies: 10
- Views: 14327
Re: MWM transport
This is a concern. It also needs to be looked at.kchase56 wrote:Yes we changed that and still had the choppy behaviour.
- Tue Mar 10, 2015 8:13 am
- Forum: Developer's Forum for Windows
- Topic: Trap all button output
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10269
Re: Trap all button output
Hi codenotes, Have a look at the SiGrabDevice() driver API. It should allow you to manage the driver "focus" from your application. You may still need to make changes to the driver profile for your application (to ensure the buttons work as you'd expect). We can assist with that, if necess...
- Tue Mar 10, 2015 8:10 am
- Forum: Developer's Forum for Windows
- Topic: MWM transport
- Replies: 10
- Views: 14327
Re: MWM transport
Hi kchase56, Removing the SolidWorks 3dconnexion add-in from 3DxWare version 10.2.3 allows Mastercam for SolidWorks Verify to function somewhat correctly, but the movement is very choppy. Did you also make the change to the protocol element in the SolidWorks.xml driver profile (found in the driver i...
- Mon Mar 09, 2015 9:12 am
- Forum: Windows Discussion Forum
- Topic: Installation fails with .Net 4.5.2
- Replies: 21
- Views: 27867
Re: Installation fails with .Net 4.5.2
Hi tschmidt,
We just got the installation log. Thank you for providing the data.
Did you previously have installed version 3.15.2 of 3DxSoftware, the older software suite for 3Dconnexion products? If so, how did you removed that software?
We just got the installation log. Thank you for providing the data.
Did you previously have installed version 3.15.2 of 3DxSoftware, the older software suite for 3Dconnexion products? If so, how did you removed that software?
- Mon Mar 09, 2015 2:36 am
- Forum: Windows Discussion Forum
- Topic: Installation fails with .Net 4.5.2
- Replies: 21
- Views: 27867
Re: Installation fails with .Net 4.5.2
I followed your instructions, but that did not help. In addition to displaying the error 1001 message, when the rollback operations are done, the setup states that it was interrupted and should be executed again. Sorry about that. Would it be possible for you to send the installation log files to o...
- Fri Mar 06, 2015 2:43 pm
- Forum: Developer's Forum for Windows
- Topic: MWM transport
- Replies: 10
- Views: 14327
Re: MWM transport
One solution is to change the driver profile to use S80 and disable (or uninstall) the 3Dconnexion add-in, which listed as "3Dcontrol" in the add-in manager panel of SolidWorks. I tried this suggestion and it still didn't work. Removing (uninstalling) the add-in turns SolidWorks to a 3D m...
- Fri Mar 06, 2015 8:59 am
- Forum: Windows Discussion Forum
- Topic: MWM transport
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2400
Re: MWM transport
Duplicate topic. See answer here.
- Fri Mar 06, 2015 8:57 am
- Forum: Developer's Forum for Windows
- Topic: MWM transport
- Replies: 10
- Views: 14327
Re: MWM transport
Hi kchase56, In the case of SolidWorks, the transport protocol is defined in the corresponding driver profile file, SolidWorks.xml. If you are developing a SolidWorks add-in that also requires a connection to a 3D mouse driver, then it will conflict with 3Dconnexion's. One solution is to change the ...
- Fri Mar 06, 2015 4:51 am
- Forum: Developer's Forum for Windows
- Topic: Is there a 'Quality Standard' mouse integration must meet ?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7452
Re: Is there a 'Quality Standard' mouse integration must mee
hi Zoony,
I believe your software will need to pass an internal check list. I do not know if this information is published anywhere.
Best send a question directly to the tech support team.
I believe your software will need to pass an internal check list. I do not know if this information is published anywhere.
Best send a question directly to the tech support team.
- Fri Mar 06, 2015 2:41 am
- Forum: Windows Discussion Forum
- Topic: Installation fails with .Net 4.5.2
- Replies: 21
- Views: 27867
Re: Installation fails with .Net 4.5.2
Hi tschmidt, I have encountered the same error (Error 1001) during the Installation of the current release (Version 10.2.3 of March 4th, 2015). Please contact me, I have already prepared an installer log file. In all likelyhood, not all the necessary .Net frameworks are installed on your system. If ...